Free Daily Newsletters
   Retirement Plans
   Health & Welfare Plans

To BenefitsLink Home Page
To EmployeeBenefitsJobs Home Page
Search the News


Featured Opportunities
Associate Vice President, Operations
Director of Retirement Plan Administration
Senior Plan Administrator
Defined Contribution Department Manager
Associate Vice President & Regional Sales Consultant
Retirement Plan Analyst
Investment-Qualified Relationship Manager and Administrator
Retirement Plan Consultant and Compliance Analyst
Defined Benefit Administrator
Search all jobs
 



Connect  

Share:
BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, Esq.

Attribution at age 18 or 21?

(Posted February 18, 2000)

Question 44: Question No. 82 of the ASPA 1999 IRS Q&As references 1563(e)(6), and it indicates that a child under age 18 will cause his parents to have a controlled group even if the parents' separate businesses are not affiliated. But when I look at Code section 1563(e)(6), age 21 is used, not age 18. What am I missing?

Answer: Nothing at all. Well done. Sometimes, as a short hand, we will talk about attribution to a minor child, but we a really talking about attribution to or from a child under age 21, regardless of the age of majority in the state involved.

Section 1563(e)(6) says there is absolute attribution for controlled group purposes between parent and child if the child is under age 21. There is attribution from a child over 20 to a parent only if the parent already owns, or is deemed to own, more than 50% of the stock (and vice versa).

By contrast, there is absolute attribution between parent and child for purpose of Section 318 (and hence, for affiliated service groups and highly compensated employees) regardless of the age of the child.

Because of this attribution, if husband and wife each own 100% of a business, and they have a child under age 21, then that child will be deemed to own both businesses so a controlled group will exist, even if there is no attribution between the parents. This is discussed in more detail in Chapter 7 of my book, Who's the Employer?.

Of course, the answer shown in the ASPA outline is correct. If the question were whether a child less than 5 would cause a controlled group, the answer would be correct. It just doesn't go far enough. Incidentally, the person who asked the question, one of my partners at the PIX BBS, received three virtual swats for the foul-up .


Important notice: Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner's situation. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of your situation. The laws, regulations and court decisions in this area change frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the laws, regulations or court decisions that occur after the date on which that Q&A is posted.
Copyright 1999-2013 S. Derrin Watson, Esq.
Related links:
 
Webmaster:
© 2014 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
Privacy Policy