QUOTE (K2retire @ Apr 25 2009, 11:08 PM)

Most non-profits don't pay well enough to have any HCEs, so the fact that this one is having a problem implies that they are both relatively large and have poor participation. Would adding a match help persuade NHCEs to defer? If so, problem solved. If not, adding a safe harbor match should be relatively inexpensive and solve the problem.
Administering both a PSP and a 403(b) sounds expensive incredibly time consuming to me.
What about adding a nonelective contribution source to the 403(b) plan and freezing or terming the 401(k) plan? Fees could be prohibitive to this option but it may end up being less expensive than a SH contribution. Some sponsors don't like matching for people who have terminated either which is what happens with SH contributions.