Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Calculation of Aggregate Sales Price under Rule 701
BenefitsLink Message Boards > Employee Benefits in General > Securities Law Aspects of Employee Benefit Plans
StephenJ7976
Does anyone know how the calculation of aggregate sales price under the registration exemption provided in Rule 701 applies with respect to phantom stock, phantom units, or restricted stock? Specifically, Rule 701(d)(3)(ii) provides:

“(ii) Time of the calculation. With respect to options to purchase securities, the aggregate sales price is determined when an option grant is made (without regard to when the option becomes exercisable). With respect to other securities, the calculation is made on the date of sale. With respect to deferred compensation or similar plans, the calculation is made when the irrevocable election to defer is made.”

However, when does the "date of sale" occur with repsect to the issuance of phantom stock, phantom units, or restricted stock?
jpod
Why would phantom stock, phantom units or restricted stock involve the "offer of a security" for which registration or an exemption is necessary?
StephenJ7976
"Investment contracts" or instruments "commonly known as a security"?
jpod
Sorry, but I'm not following you. Is there an offer to sell restricted stock, phantom stock or phantom units? (I am assuming that there is no consideration changing hands, other than the employee's services.)
StephenJ7976
No offer -- restricted stock, phantom stock and/ or phantom units are granted to employees under LTIP
jpod
Based on your response, I don't understand why you are trying to figure out how 701 should apply. You don't need to register anything or an exemption from registration.
Steelerfan
QUOTE (jpod @ Nov 8 2007, 10:37 AM) *
Based on your response, I don't understand why you are trying to figure out how 701 should apply. You don't need to register anything or an exemption from registration.

I think the SEC considers an interest in a NQDC plan to be a security, thus creating the need for registration or satisfaction of an exemption. As to how to value them, that is the big problem under 701, assuming that exemption is available. Restricted stock should not require an exemption as it is not NQDC.
jpod
The SEC staff would consider an interest in a NQDC Plan a security subject to registration only if it was elective. How is that pertinent to the facts stated by StephenJ7976?
Steelerfan
QUOTE (jpod @ Nov 8 2007, 11:48 AM) *
The SEC staff would consider an interest in a NQDC Plan a security subject to registration only if it was elective. How is that pertinent to the facts stated by StephenJ7976?

You're right about that, but public companies will normally file an S-8 and provide a prospectus supplement with grants of phantom units just in case. With these equity-flavored plans, are you 100% comfortable not complying with an exemption?
jpod
Yes, 100% comfortable. Do you have any S-8s for phantom stock plans handy which you can cite to us? Granted, there are S-8s out there covering omnibus plans that contain both registerable interests and non-registerable interests, but I would hardly characterize that as doing an S-8 for a free phantom stock plan "just in case."
Steelerfan
QUOTE (jpod @ Nov 8 2007, 02:12 PM) *
Yes, 100% comfortable. Do you have any S-8s for phantom stock plans handy which you can cite to us? Granted, there are S-8s out there covering omnibus plans that contain both registerable interests and non-registerable interests, but I would hardly characterize that as doing an S-8 for a free phantom stock plan "just in case."

Just the one for the company I work for and I don't want to disclose that here. It could be for the omnibus plan, but I don't think so, because the prospectus supplements relate only to the grants of units, which are separate agreements. Maybe they're being overly cautious or could it be that the executive is a proxy officer, and that's why?
Exec_Ben_N_Ret_Med_Guru
QUOTE (Steelerfan @ Nov 8 2007, 03:09 PM) *
QUOTE (jpod @ Nov 8 2007, 02:12 PM) *
Yes, 100% comfortable. Do you have any S-8s for phantom stock plans handy which you can cite to us? Granted, there are S-8s out there covering omnibus plans that contain both registerable interests and non-registerable interests, but I would hardly characterize that as doing an S-8 for a free phantom stock plan "just in case."

Just the one for the company I work for and I don't want to disclose that here. It could be for the omnibus plan, but I don't think so, because the prospectus supplements relate only to the grants of units, which are separate agreements. Maybe they're being overly cautious or could it be that the executive is a proxy officer, and that's why?


Or is there some voluntary deferral in the construction of the plan?
Steelerfan
I think jpod was right, it's for an omnibus plan of a public co. and there is an S-8 already out there. Maybe there's more of a question if the company isn't public, I don't know.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.