It is possible that this woman could take distributions from the IRA now, pay tax on same, buy life insurance with the net (or, if the Federal Estate Tax is an issue, gift the net to an ILIT and have the ILIT buy insurance on her life), and the NET wealth transferred to heirs will be greater than it will be (given assumptions) in the present scenario.
It's also possible that the reverse will be true. I've done a LOT of analyses of this type, and the big factors appear to be (a) Federal Estate Tax - the more FET, the better this "end run" technique works. It often does NOT work well if there is no FET liability (B) growth rate assumed on the IRA and on the insurance death benefit (if any), and © the insurance rate she can qualify for.
Some insurers offer this type of analysis, but I've seen some that leave a LOT to be desired in the way of precision (not to say "honesty"). A program called "catalyst" is perhaps the clearest and easiest illustration of this technique I've yet seen. It's the brainchild of Ron and Scott Thevenot, and info on same is available on
www.catmarkinc.com. As was noted, life insurance cannot be purchased with IRA money. A purported way around this is currently being touted, using a FLP, and relying VERY heavily on the scanty authority of the Swanson case. In my opinion, the idea ranks right up there with Charitable Reverse Split Dollar.
------------------
John L. Olsen, CLU, ChFC
Olsen Financial Group
St. Louis, MO
314-909-8818