wlank
Nov 13 2006, 07:51 PM
W-2 Contribution Cont. %
NHCE $12,480.00 $268.00 2.15%
NHCE $44,325.00 $953.00 2.15%
HCE $210,000.00 $13,339.00 6.35%
HCE $6,510.00 $140.00 2.15%
I was asked to review a plan with the above contributions and contribution perecntages for 2005 plan year. Plan is and was TOP HEAVY as far back as I was provided data - 2002. Plan passed the required tests, and is using the 3/1 gateway.
Seems like the NHCE's should have received a 3% contribution, or have I missed something here.
Bill
Tom Poje
Nov 14 2006, 07:04 AM
based on data provided, I would agree, plan needs to provide top heavy minimum
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish
Nov 14 2006, 10:08 AM
Unlikely, but is the HCE receiving 6.35% a non-key?
wlank
Nov 14 2006, 02:03 PM
"Unlikely, but is the HCE receiving 6.35% a non-key?"
NO. It's a dental practice, and he's the dentist. Sole proprietor. 100% owner.
I'm glad I'm not the TPA for 2005. Thanks Tom and BT3EF.
Bill
greybeard
Nov 14 2006, 04:11 PM
Were you engaged to review only 2005? How far back does the problem exist?
wlank
Nov 14 2006, 06:20 PM
"How far back does the problem exist?"
No problems with 2002, 03, or 04. I have not seen any data prior to 2002, but the plan was ammended to a cross-tested plan in 2002.
What is the proper way to correct the 2005 allocation?
1. Reallocate the 2005 contribution (with corrected reports to participants) or, 2. do a make up contribution in 2006?
Bill
SoCalActuary
Nov 29 2006, 11:01 AM
Unless the assets were in earmarked accounts with individual investment direction, I would just re-allocate.
If the assets were already given to the individuals to invest, I would ask for more contribution.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.