Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Projecting Benefits With a Salary Scale, Funding Without
BenefitsLink Message Boards > Retirement Plans > Defined Benefit Plans, Including Cash Balance
merlin
Takeover plan, 6 participants, Individual aggregate cost method. Benefits are projected with a 4-1/2% salary scale, but funded based on a level dollar amount rather than a level percentage of pay. I've never seen his technique before. Is it a problem?
rcline46
ALL of our individual aggregate plans are funded level $ amount. It is not a problem. Level % gives increasing costs, level $ gives same cost as long as salary scale is met. Sort of like prefunding!
SoCalActuary
Going back to the proposed 412 regulations, this has been an approved funding method for a long time. It should have been covered in the education materials that enrolled actuaries must study. tongue.gif
pax
Nothing wrong with this technique.
It may be because the HCE (ususally only one) is already over or close to the 401(a)(17) limit, in which case the salary scale is almost meaningless, espcially when the HCE represents most of the liability.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.