bzorc
Nov 8 2004, 10:37 AM
A doctor owns 100% of his own medical practice. He also owns 100% of a business in a non-medical field. Does this constitute a controlled group?
Thanks for any responses.
Belgarath
Nov 8 2004, 10:40 AM
Yes.
PATA
Nov 8 2004, 10:57 AM
The fact that the two businesses are not in the same field (i.e. medical practice and sells car batteries) does not make a difference.... he "controls" both companies by virture of his percentage of ownership.
bzorc
Nov 8 2004, 11:48 AM
I agree. Now suppose the medical practice, consisting solely of the doctor, has adopted a profit sharing plan. I would think that the non-medical company would have to adopt the plan as well, and cover the employees that meet the eligibility requirements. Is that a correct assumption?
Thanks again.
Belgarath
Nov 8 2004, 12:26 PM
Not necessarily. You have to include them for nondiscrimination testing purposes. Suppose the medical company has 15 employees, all of whom are covered. If the nonmedical company has only 5 employees, then they could be excluded and you'd still pass your 70% test.
Of course, in real life the situation is usually exaclty the opposite. They want to cover the business with the owner and spouse, and exclude everyone else!
Effen
Nov 8 2004, 03:08 PM
QUOTE
Now suppose the medical practice, consisting solely of the doctor, has adopted a profit sharing plan
- no way that flys unless the other group has some sort of qualified plan, and even then, you would need to prove that you weren't discriminating.
Belgarath
Nov 8 2004, 03:21 PM
I didn't focus on the words "consisting solely of the doctor." I was thinking more in general terms, as you can see by my example. So I agree with Effen!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.