We have recently encountered this issue with two separate insurance/annuity providers and are not sure what to do. We are trying to find out if the insurance companies are in fact handling this properly.
Scenario: Employee should have been paid out 80% of account balance in 2000. An error was made and he was only paid 60%. The insurance company will only pay the additional 20% as of the original date of distribution. No allowance to be made for gains and/or losses. In our case, it is the participant's favor because the account balance not paid out in 2000 actually lost money from 2000 to now. Is this correct? What is the reasoning and/or legal basis for not paying gains (if any exist) or not taking into account losses (if any exist) for such a distribution.