A DB Plan provides that the pension cannot be deferred beyond age 65. Participant Dick Putz is given a timely election package. The Company's records show that Dick is unmarried. A year later a legally married wife from whom Dick has been separated pops out of the woodwork demanding that she had never signed off on his election and that the pension should have been distributed under the automatic J&S form, which was a J&100% survivor annuity. It is determined that the separation is not a legal separation whatever the reasons.
Case I
Dick elected and received lump sum payment.
Case II
Dick did not return his election package and so after attempting to communicate with Dick (via telephone and certified mail which is accepted), the Plan started his pension under the life annuity form believing he was unmarried.
Interested in comments from anyone who has experience with situations like this on how the issue was resolved. Is the response any different if say "n" (n>5) years rather than one year has elapsed?
