QUOTE (Tom Poje @ Sep 10 2009, 11:09 AM)

ok, so you had an acquistion in 2007, which means you get the transition rules which covers you through 2008.
so for 2009 you have to treat all employees as if there is one employer.
and you use the least stringent eligiblity requirements (but since you can test otherwise excludables separately it is probably easier to do that, and the net effect would be as if both plans have a 1 year wait - unless you manage to have some HCEs who have less than a year of service)
now, after that, your results will depend on whether you are going to permissively aggregate the plans (in which case all employees show up on the ADP test, and everyone pretty much benefits for coverage) or
test separately (which could cause a coverage since all employees from one company are treated as includable and not benefiting, but then they don't show up on the ADP test when you test the other plan)
In other words, if you do not aggregate, you would have Plan A - Only ees of A benefit for coverage, B includable not benefiting, and the ADP test is only ees from A.
and
you would have Plan B - Only ees of B benefit for coverage, A includable not benefiting, and the ADP test is only ees from B.
again, I am assuming you test otherwise excludable separately and therefore the different eligibility requirements does not come into play.
So it seems I should test ADP on all employees who met the lesser requirement which is 2 months (Plan B). Coverga would not pass if I had to aggregate both Plans since one is a 2 month wait and the other is a 1yr wait. We can then amend the Plan (A) as of 1/1/10 to allow all employees currently eligible to particpate in (Plan A) and then require the 1 year wait for all new hires?