Steve Palmer
Mar 24 2009, 11:37 PM
X is the 100% owner of C-Corp business that has employees. X also 60% owner with unrelated Y of LLC business with no employees. Business activities of each entity are unrelated...Y has no connection with C-Corp. C-Corp has an existing SIMPLE. X would like to make a maximum SEP contribution based on share of LLC business income without involving C-Corp employees or violating exclusive test for SIMPLE.
It appears that this could be done in this case as the control group (brother-sister) test (1563 and 414(b)) is not met since X as the 100% owner of C-Corp only owns 60% of LLC, so the 80% test is no met.
I am uncertain how, or if, to apply the 415(h) test where 50% is substituted for 80%. Does this cause the above to fail?
Also, does X's spouse taking a salary at C-Corp pose any problems (community property state)?
Thank you for your thoughts.
Sieve
Mar 25 2009, 07:51 PM
415(h) would capture both of these businsses only for purposes of 415 annual addition purposes and then only if they were related as parent-sub as per IRC Section 1563(a). Yours are related as brother-sister, so 415(h) does not apply.
And, your conclusion that they are not otherwise a controlled group for other pension purposes is correct.
ak2ary
Sep 13 2011, 11:36 AM
But isn't the C-Corp deemed to own the stock owned by its majority owner...thus the C-Corp would own 60% of the LLC in a parent sub analysis...which might trigger 415(h)...no?
Sieve
Sep 13 2011, 03:20 PM
There is no attribution TO a corp/p'ship/trust, just FROM a corp/p'ship/trust. So, stock owned by an individual is not treated as owned by a corp, but stock owned by a corp can be treated as stock owned by an individual.
Of course, my initial answer way back assumed that the other 40% of the LLC was not, in some way, attributed to X (such as if his/her kids owned 21% of LLC)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.