QUOTE (Sieve @ Mar 17 2009, 03:39 PM)

I'm not a DB heavyweight, so I'm hoping some of you will weigh in on this one . . .
Must the 415 limitation be actuarially reduced based on the form of distribution? Is the answer the same if the form of benefit is a 50 J&S?
If it is not required that there be an actuarial 415 reduction for a J&S, is there any circumstance where the 415 limitation can/will be actuarially reduced for a 50% J&S form of payment?
1. Yes, unless it is the QJSA.
2. Sure, if the plan says that the optional forms (including the QJSA) are the actuarial equivalent of the normal form, or if the form is not the QJSA.
In other words, the QJSA would be reduced by plan terms if not explicitly "subsidized" under the terms of the plan. The 415 limit is based on the lesser of the benefit adjusted using plan factors and the benefit adjusted using statutory factors (in this case no reduction).