MBCarey
Sep 11 2008, 08:15 AM
Can someone tell me if the son of an owner is hired in July and will not be eligible for the plan until he has a year of service. Is he still considered HC for 2008?
ERISAnut
Sep 11 2008, 08:18 AM
Of course he is HCE. He's just not eligible due to age/service requirements; but still an HCE.
Hope this helps.
MBCarey
Sep 11 2008, 08:29 AM
Sorry to be so dense. I would not count him in the testing until he is eligible, correct? I think I've been at this tooo long.
Thanks
ERISAnut
Sep 11 2008, 08:42 AM
QUOTE (MBCarey @ Sep 11 2008, 09:29 AM)

Sorry to be so dense. I would not count him in the testing until he is eligible, correct? I think I've been at this tooo long.
Thanks
You are correct. He will be excluded from all tests because he as failed initial eligibility (age/service).
Jim Chad
Sep 11 2008, 10:26 AM
I would add "unless you are testing excludables seperately.
ERISAnut
Sep 11 2008, 02:56 PM
I see what you are saying, but you must first meet eligibility under the terms of the plan to be includable in any test. If the plan prescribes a 21 & 1 provision, then no one who is less than 21 or who worked less than 1 year of service will be in any test performed by the plan (because the failed initial eligibility). That doesn't prevent them from being HCE, they are just an HCE who failed initial eligibility; and are therefore excluded from all tests.
If the plan, however, had immediate eligiblity then you would be allowed to test separately between the early entrants and the regular 21 & 1 employees. Heck, you may also test the 'early entrant HCE' in the group with the regular 21 & 1 employees.
TooMuchFreeTime
Oct 2 2008, 04:01 PM
Am I missing something? If he was hired in 2008, he wouldn't have any 2007 compensation. Absent that, isn't it impossible for him to be an HCE?
Or is there some sort of attribution rules I'm missing involving the owner/father?
ERISAnut
Oct 2 2008, 04:05 PM
QUOTE (TooMuchFreeTime @ Oct 2 2008, 05:01 PM)

Am I missing something? If he was hired in 2008, he wouldn't have any 2007 compensation. Absent that, isn't it impossible for him to be an HCE?
Or is there some sort of attribution rules I'm missing involving the owner/father?
Section 318 of the IRC. You own what your parents own for HCE purposes.
BG5150
Oct 3 2008, 10:19 AM
QUOTE (Jim Chad @ Sep 11 2008, 11:26 AM)

I would add "unless you are testing excludables seperately.
From what I understand, he's not even eligible yet, so he isn't even excludable. He simply isn't in the plan.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.