cosmo01
Nov 4 2003, 09:41 AM
We have a situation wherein a person is an employee of Company A and President of Company B. She, however, does provide services, on a limited basis, to Company B. She participates in the 401(k) plan, etc. of Company A, and not Company B. Do we have to take her into consideration for testing purposes with respect to Company B? Any guidance, sites, regs, input, etc. would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish
Nov 4 2003, 11:57 AM
Are company A and company B either a controlled group or affiliated service group?
cosmo01
Nov 4 2003, 02:25 PM
No, Company A and Company B are not in the same controlled group or affiliated group.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish
Nov 4 2003, 03:25 PM
Then what you have here is just a person with 2 employers that aren't related and aren't considered for each others' testing. It would be like you having two jobs, one as a TPA and the other as a circus clown. The plan under the TPA firm would not be worried about your other employment except that you might accidentally wear to work the suit with the flower that squirts water.
QUOTE (Blinky the 3-eyed Fish @ Nov 4 2003, 04:25 PM)
It would be like you having two jobs, one as a TPA and the other as a circus clown.
How different are these?
But I digress. From numerous discussions on these Message Boards, it appears that the determination of
controlled group or
affiliated service group is often incorrectly diagnosed. So be careful.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish
Nov 4 2003, 04:43 PM
QUOTE (pax @ Nov 4 2003, 01:35 PM)
How different are these?
Pax, I think my prior post covered the bulk of the differences. The suit with the flower is for clowning, the suit without it is for TPA work.
Brian Gallagher
Nov 5 2003, 10:50 AM
funny. most people can't tell the difference between a circus clown and a tpa.
Brian Gallagher
Nov 5 2003, 10:51 AM
just kidding!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.