Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is it a partial termination if 3 out of 4 participants voluntarily terminate employment? In this particular case, after the mass exodus the employer now has no employees and has not had any compensation for the last 2 years. This is a MPPP and now we have considerable "forfeitures" that can't be allocated because we have no compensation. Seems to me that this may qualify as a partial termination.

Posted

The termination of participation has to be INVOLUNTARY to trigger cause a partial termination. However, in Kreis v. Charles O. Townley, M.D. and Associates, P.C., 833 F.2d 74(6th Cir. 1987) the court addressed the issue of a constructive discharge theory: "Whether a constructive discharge has occurred will depend on a number of factors, including the employer's intent, the working conditions and the reasonably forseeable impact of the employer's conduct on the employees who quit."

Tripodi's ERISA Outline Book 1999/2000 edition covers the issue on pp. 4.78-4.81

Audit guidelines state that IRS presumes all terminations are involuntary unless the employer shows otherwise.

Posted

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

I agree with SHP, howevre, I think that factually this likely will be deemed a termination.

Remember that the forfeiture be allocated among all the participants.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use